loading page

Genetic variability and the ecology of geographic range: a test of the central-marginal hypothesis in Australian scincid lizards
  • Sonal Singhal,
  • John Wrath,
  • Daniel Rabosky
Sonal Singhal
CSU Dominguez Hills

Corresponding Author:sonal.singhal1@gmail.com

Author Profile
John Wrath
CSU Dominguez Hills
Author Profile
Daniel Rabosky
University of Michigan
Author Profile


For many species, both local abundance and regional occupancy are highest near the center of their geographic distributions. One hypothesis for this pattern is that niche suitability declines with increasing distance from a species geographic center, such that populations near range margins are characterized by reduced density and increased patchiness. In these smaller edge populations, genetic drift is more powerful, leading to the loss of genetic diversity. This simple verbal model has been formalized as the central-marginal hypothesis, which predicts that core populations should have greater genetic diversity than edge populations. However, demographic shifts over time can generate a similar pattern. For example, in species with expanding ranges, populations at the range edge experience serial founder effects, creating a gradient of declining genetic diversity from the range core to edge. Testing the central-marginal hypothesis properly thus requires us to consider the confounding role of historical demography. Here, we account for the role of history in testing the central-marginal hypothesis using a genomic dataset of 25 species-level taxa of Australian skink lizards (genus: Ctenotus and Lerista). We found support for the central-marginal hypothesis in 16 of our 25 taxa, of which eight taxa recovered significant support. Unexpectedly, species with the strongest evidence for range expansion were the least likely to follow predictions of the central-marginal hypothesis. The majority of these species had range expansions that originated at the range edge, which led to lower genetic diversity at the range edge compared to the core, contrary to the central-marginal hypothesis.
19 Nov 2021Submitted to Molecular Ecology
21 Nov 2021Submission Checks Completed
21 Nov 2021Assigned to Editor
03 Dec 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
14 Jan 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
20 Jan 2022Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
05 May 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
05 May 20221st Revision Received
09 May 2022Reviewer(s) Assigned
20 Jun 2022Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
23 Jun 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
23 Jun 20222nd Revision Received
27 Jun 2022Editorial Decision: Accept
Aug 2022Published in Molecular Ecology volume 31 issue 16 on pages 4242-4253. 10.1111/mec.16589